Sunday, June 21, 2009

US Dollar Collapse: Transit Japan - Italy - Switzerland: Suitcase With $134 Billion Puts Dollar on Edge RMK.v, TNR.v, CGH.to, SNU.v, SGC.v, ASM.v,


If Bonds are genuine, buy Euro - Italy will cure its problems with 40% windfall into the budget: 54 billion will be a nice cut. It is a joke - as US Dollar itself.
Will you be surprised to find a total mess at FED and Treasury, if Ron Paul's audit ever allowed? Are you surprised that FED is not part of the US Government, but private corporation? The key word here is counterfeit: you can not counterfeit Gold or Silver - we are at the turning point for US Dollar this summer, what is worthless will be worthless and what is real will be real.


"Suitcase With $134 Billion Puts Dollar on Edge: William Pesek

Commentary by William Pesek
June 17 (Bloomberg) -- It’s a plot better suited for a John Le Carre novel.
Two Japanese men are detained in Italy after allegedly attempting to take $134 billion worth of U.S. bonds over the border into Switzerland. Details are maddeningly sketchy, so naturally the global rumor mill is kicking into high gear.
Are these would-be smugglers agents of Kim Jong Il stashing North Korea’s cash in a Swiss vault? Bagmen for Nigerian Internet scammers? Was the money meant for terrorists looking to buy nuclear warheads? Is Japan dumping its dollars secretly? Are the bonds real or counterfeit?
The implications of the securities being legitimate would be bigger than investors may realize. At a minimum, it would suggest that the U.S. risks losing control over its monetary supply on a massive scale.
The trillions of dollars of debt the U.S. will issue in the next couple of years needs buyers. Attracting them will require making sure that existing ones aren’t losing faith in the U.S.’s ability to control the dollar.
The dollar is, for better or worse, the core of our world economy and it’s best to keep it stable. News that’s more fitting for international spy novels than the financial pages won’t help that effort. It is incumbent upon the U.S. Treasury to get to the bottom of this tale and keep markets informed.
GDP Carriers
Think about it: These two guys were carrying the gross domestic product of New Zealand or enough for three Beijing Olympics. If economies were for sale, the men could buy Slovakia and Croatia and have plenty left over for Mongolia or Cambodia. Yes, they could have built vacation homes amidst Genghis Khan’s Gobi Desert or the famed Temples of Angkor. Bernard Madoff who?
These men carrying bonds concealed in the bottom of their luggage also would be the fourth-largest U.S. creditors. It makes you wonder if some of the time Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner spends keeping the Chinese and Japanese invested in dollars should be devoted to well-financed men crossing the Italian-Swiss border.
This tale has gotten little attention in markets, perhaps because of the absurdity of our times. The last year has been a decidedly disorienting one for capitalists who once knew up from down, red from black and risk from reward. It almost fits with the surreal nature of today that a couple of travelers have more U.S. debt than Brazil in a suitcase and, well, that’s life.
Clancy Bestseller
You can almost picture Tom Clancy sitting in his study thinking: “Damn! Why didn’t I think of this yarn and novelize it years ago?” He could have sprinkled in a Chinese angle, a pinch of Russian intrigue, a dose of Pyongyang and a bit of Taiwan-Strait tension into the mix. Presto, a sure bestseller.
Daniel Craig may be thinking this is a great story on which to base the next James Bond flick. Perhaps Don Johnson could buy the rights to this tale. In 2002, the “Miami Vice” star was stopped by German customs officers as he was traveling in a car carrying credit notes and other securities worth as much as $8 billion. Now he could claim it was all, uh, research.
When I first heard of the $134 billion story, I was tempted to glance at my calendar to make sure it didn’t read April 1.
Let’s assume for a moment that these U.S. bonds are real. That would make a mockery of Japanese Finance Minister Kaoru Yosano’s “absolutely unshakable” confidence in the credibility of the U.S. dollar. Yosano would have some explaining to do about Japan’s $686 billion of U.S. debt if more of these suitcase capers come to light.
‘Kennedy Bonds’
Counterfeit $100 bills are one thing; two guys with undeclared bonds including 249 certificates worth $500 million and 10 “Kennedy bonds” of $1 billion each is quite another.
The bust could be a boon for Italy. If the securities are found to be genuine, the smugglers could be fined 40 percent of the total value for attempting to take them out of the country. Not a bad payday for a government grappling with a widening budget deficit and rebuilding the town of L’Aquila, which was destroyed by an earthquake in April.
It would be terrible news for the White House. Other than the U.S., China or Japan, no other nation could theoretically move those amounts. In the absence of clear explanations coming from the Treasury, conspiracy theories are filling the void.
On his blog, the Market Ticker, Karl Denninger wonders if the Treasury “has been surreptitiously issuing bonds to, say, Japan, as a means of financing deficits that someone didn’t want reported over the last, oh, say 10 or 20 years.” Adds Denninger: “Let’s hope we get those answers, and this isn’t one of those ‘funny things’ that just disappears into the night.”
This is still a story with far more questions than answers. It’s odd, though, that it’s not garnering more media attention. Interest is likely to grow. The last thing Geithner and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke need right now is tens of billions more of U.S. bonds -- or even high-quality fake ones -- suddenly popping up around the globe.
(William Pesek is a Bloomberg News columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.)
To contact the writer of this column: William Pesek in Tokyo at wpesek@bloomberg.net2

TNR Gold Los Azules: Minera Andes names McEwen as interim president and CEO. TNR.v, MAI.to, CGH.to, NG.to, ABX, CDNX, HUI, XAU, FXI

We like smell of ink and noise of printing machines: with every press run our Copper story is getting stronger.





We always search for clues in corporate takeovers - what is really going on. Here we have at least "thank you" and respect to Mr Ambrose, in high voltage charged Lithium market place of our Next Big Thing Canada Lithium CLQ.v CEO Jude Baker was just "terminated" leaving a lot of questions open. It is important that corporate fights and developments are happening in companies where the money is flowing now and near term catalyst in value perception is taking place. In February Minera Andes MAI.to was trading below 0.4CAD and now it is almost at the level of 1.0CAD - at this price Mr Gold Corp - Robert McEwen paid for a stake to overtake the company. Robert McEwen now is overtaking management as well as an interim President and CEO of the company. It means that he is not happy with Mr Ambrose as CEO any more and can not even wait until a new CEO is found. On another hand company is important enough to put his name down as CEO and roll up the sleeves. For us it is all signs of a Hot Winter in Argentina this year. Xstrata is considering its option to develop further Los Azules, Copper is holding above 2.1USD/lb and NPV of Los Azules is at 1 billion USD at this level of copper prices.
At recent AGM Los Azules was one of the major value points:
"Mr. McEwen and president/CEO Allen Ambrose will be hosting a presentation to attendees at 2:00pm, just following the formal AGM. We hope you will be able to join us! Minera Andes has great growth potential in Argentina. The company's San Jose silver/gold mine is increasing production and expanding its reserves & resources; the company's Los Azules copper deposit is being considered for further development by world copper producer Xstrata; and the company has announced drill programs on 100% owned silver/gold projects near its producing mine. With elevated prices in gold, silver and copper, we look forward to showing why Minera Andes Inc. is a strong company with a bright future."
We should say "thank you" to outgoing CEO Allen Ambrose on our part: for development of Los Azules, for bringing in Lukas Lundin and Robert McEwen, for our ride with him from 0.4CAD level in 2004 to over 2.0CAD in 2007, for not buying out TNR Gold TNR.v during the recent crisis at some kind of rock bottom management desperation valuation of 0.1CAD. This last part of our personal sincere "thank you", could be one of the reason for his departure now: Los Azules is the big game play and he did not manage to identify and pursue the side of play with Xstrata and TNR Gold. We understood that Robert McEwen get a surprise that somebody is claiming 12.5% (25% back in into Northern part 50% of total deposit) effectively from deposit in back in claims. Only in last year annual report and all financial filing from this year Minera Andes has acknowledged the existence of claims. Should we say "material change" to previously disclosed information? You can not finance the project of 1.3 billion USD with legal dispute ongoing on part of it in our opinion. Price to pay this winter to solve the problem was max 20 million USD. To make things more complecated 43-101 has been calculated using for mining facilities part of Escorpio IV, which TNR Gold claims to be its property. Terrain in Los Azules does not allow to shuffle mining operations around easily - one more point missed by previous management in Minera Andes. We have understood that at recent PDAC in Toronto Robert McEwen has been briefed on all situation by TNR Gold, when Mr Ambrose was still in charge and according to our sources was "hardly available for any discussions". Now Xstrata is deciding whether to back in for 51% or not, those 12.5% of TNR Gold's deposit could be very handy for Robert McEwen camp should Junior win the case. We can not blame Mr Ambrose - at the time copper was still below 1.7 USD/lb and TNR Gold did not rolled out its Lithium and REE strategic move. It will be interesting to monitor now how Robert McEwen will move the situation forward. Next important step is Xstrata's decision on back in of 51% of the project and then TNR Gold's actions within its lawsuit. Recent developments in TNR Gold's boardroom give us some clues that company has sufficient corporate, technical and financial back up to sit in boardrooms and do the talking for the maximum value of its properties, it is not any more 20 million quick fix in the game of big guys.
"SPOKANE, WA, June 18 /CNW/ - Minera Andes Inc. (the "Corporation" or "Minera Andes") (TSX: MAI and US OTC: MNEAF) announces that following the Corporation's annual general and special meeting today, Mr. Robert R. McEwen has been appointed interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation effective immediately, replacing Mr. Allen Ambrose. Mr. Ambrose was re-elected to the Board of Directors of the Corporation.
Minera Andes would like to thank Mr. Ambrose, a founder of the Corporation, for his dedication and service to the Corporation. Under Mr. Ambrose's stewardship, Minera Andes grew from a junior exploration company to a company with exploration success in Argentina and a significant interest in a producing mine.
Minera Andes is a gold, silver and copper exploration company working in Argentina. The Company holds approximately 304,000 acres of mineral exploration land in Argentina. The producing San José silver/gold mine is 49% owned by Minera Andes through a joint venture. Minera Andes is also exploring the Los Azules copper project in San Juan province, where an exploration program has defined a resource and a scoping study has been completed. Other exploration properties, primarily silver and gold, are being evaluated in southern Argentina. The Corporation presently has 230,538,851 shares issued and outstanding."

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Lithium and REE: Mitsubishi Plans Five More Electric Cars TNR.v, SQM, ROC, TTM, BYD, NSANY, TM, F, GOOG, WLC.v, AVL.to, HUI, XAU, FXI, AAPL, RIMM


Here comes our mass market for the Next Big Thing. Choice and price range will make Electric cars reality on our roads. 20% of volume for EV by 2020 is not bad for beginning of Lithium rush.


June 18, 2009, 12:29 pm

Mitsubishi Plans Five More Electric Cars

By Richard S. Chang

Mitsubishi announced earlier this month that its i-MiEV electric car would cost $45,660, and Wheels readers raised their eyebrows at the high price for the tiny car. Even with a $14,000 credit from the Japanese government, the car would be expensive for what it is — a small city car with a battery range of 75 to 100 miles.
“These companies better get real about their prices, unless they are including a lifetime supply of batteries,” wrote Dick.
“That sum is about equal to the retail value of all three of my existing cars when they were brand new,” wrote Steve O.
It looks as if Mitsubishi is well aware of the i-MiEV’s sticker shock. The Nikkei reports (via Bloomberg News) that the Japanese company is working on a cheaper electric car with a target price of $31,000 (or $17,000 after Japanese credits), which it plans to bring to market by 2012.
According to Green Car Congress, which also cites the Nikkei, Mitsubishi has plans for an additional five electric cars by the end of the 2013 fiscal year. These include a left-hand-drive i-MiEV by the 2010 fiscal year for the European market (and later the American market); an electric commercial vehicle in the 2010 fiscal year; a larger electric car; a sportier version of the i-MiEV; and a plug-in hybrid S.U.V. by the 2013 fiscal year.
Mitsubishi is the only major automaker producing electric cars in any volume, if you consider volume 1,400 i-MiEVs — four-seaters — by next spring. In a statement released this month, Mitsubishi said its goal was to have 20 percent of its production volume be E.V.’s by 2020."

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Gold and Gold miners: High probability of Reversal from current correction. HUI, XAU, GDX, GDL, SVL, TNR.v, RMK.v, CGH.to, ASM.v, GBN.v, SNU.v, SGC.v,

We have a high probability that recent correction in Gold and Gold miners will be reversed into Bullish move. First above is Gold weekly chart. Please notice that our Cup and Handle bullish formation is still in tact. RSI is neutral and close to the base of previous move up, MACD is neutral, Slow STO is above 60. So far bullish candle is forming this week. We need to look at daily picture below to find out more clues on market sentiment.
Here is daily chart of Gold: picture even more clear on positive side: Bullish combinations of candles: End of range yesterday and Bullish White Hammer today, observation is supported by Slow STO at Buy and RSI turning positive. MACD is in neutral. On recent correction move MA50 was tested and Hold so far. In the bull market Gold shares should lead gold in its move.

Gold Bugs Index daily is positive of all our observations: Two very bullish candles - End of range yesterday and Hammer today, Slow STO is at Buy, RSI at base of previous move Up, MACD is forming buying base. MA50 was tested, violated intraday, but we closed today at it, if tomorrow close will not violate it we can have confirmation of reversal. We have identical picture below with XAU with even stronger candles when MA50 was not violated even intraday.







Roxmark reports high-grade gold intersections at EP and SP Zone targets of Hardrock Project. RMK.v, PG.tp, HUI, XAU, TLT, DXY, GDX

Another great results from Premier Gold PG.to from Roxmark Mines RMK.v Hardrock project:
19.03 g/t Au across 11.3m and 6.63 g/t Au across 28.1m.
Deposit is shaping very nicely with high grade core, 4 drills are turning fast and resource estimation will be by the year end.
We saw last two days interesting technical formation in Gold stocks, which could lead to bullish reversal from recent correction. TA on Roxmark Mines is very strong now: Cup and Handle bullish formation, Slow STO at Buy, RSI and MACD are neutral - any buying pressure will bring break out from this consolidation phase.



Roxmark reports high-grade gold intersections at EP and SP Zone targets of Hardrock Project
On Wednesday June 17, 2009, 5:25 pm EDT

19.03 g/t Au across 11.3m and 6.63 g/t Au across 28.1m

TORONTO, June 17 /CNW Telbec/ - Roxmark Mines Limited (TSXV-RMK) today announced that ongoing drilling by Premier Gold Mines Limited (TSX-PG) as operator continues to define significant gold mineralization in multiple zones at the Company's Hardrock Joint Venture Project in the Geraldton camp, Northwestern Ontario. The current program, consisting of delineation and exploration drilling, will continue throughout 2009 and is expected to result in an NI 43-101-compliant resource estimate by year end.
Drilling at the EP Zone continues to exceed expectations with recent step-out and infill holes returning some of the best results received to date. The first three holes drilled to test the South Porphyry Zone ("SP") have all returned high-grade gold mineralization within multiple zones.
Highlights from recent drilling include:
<< - EP Zone: 5.21 grams per tonne gold (g/t Au) across 37.0 metres within the North Limb - 19.03 g/t Au across 11.3 metres in step-out drilling on the South Limb - SP Zone: 6.63 g/t Au across 28.1 metres within the SP Zone underground target 36.22 g/t Au (1.06 oz/ton) across 2.2 metres within the HGV Zone target. >>
Roxmark has a 30% carried interest in the Hardrock Project. The Hardrock Project is host to several past-producing mines which collectively produced nearly 3.0 million ounces of gold within 600 metres of surface from 1938-1968.
Early drilling in 2009 focussed on open pit-style mineralization and is now targeting the huge potential to expand higher grade mineralization amenable to efficient underground mining methods. Historically at Hardrock, little effort was made to define narrow vein, high grade mineralization as bulk mining methods were used to extract the ore.
EP-Zone
-------
The EP-Zone has been identified as a potential high-grade open pit target in the vicinity of the historic North Zone, from which 2.97 million short tons of ore were mined at a recovered grade of 0.22 ounces per ton gold (7.54 g/t Au). Drilling has intersected mineralization in multiple sub-zones within the EP target over a strike length of 600 metres.
Previous highlights include 7.60 g/t Au across 20.5 m in hole EP044, 2.37 g/t Au across 62.7 m in hole EP026, and 4.17 g/t Au across 29.0 m in hole EP053. New results, that include 6.66 g/t Au across 14.0 m in hole EP074, 5.21 g/t Au across 37.0 m in hole EP079, and 19.03 g/t Au across 11.3 m in hole EP080 continue to define and expand mineralization within the EP target area." More

Lithium and REE: Ford is Bullish on Plug-In Hybrids TNR.v, F, TM, NSANY, DAI, TTM, BYD, SQM, ROC, FXI, HUI, XAU, AVL.to, WLC.v, RM.v, CNY.v, GOOG,

It is a good news...for Ford to stay connected, but with this kind of tempo they will be out of Green Mobility revolution, will China lead here as well? Toyta, Honda and Nissan looks like leaders of Green Mobility by now, Chinese BYD and others are next in the pack - Detroit is dangerously behind. Wait until Tata Motors will roll out it electric car promised by September - what will be the pricing there?




"Unlike Toyota, Ford is Bullish on Plug-In Hybrids



Ford, the only one of the Big Three not to declare bankruptcy, is nonetheless still in a fairly big hole. For all of 2008, Ford’s sales were down 21 percent. There’s a slight hint of a turnaround in the reports from May: although sales were still way down (24.2 percent) compared to the previous year, the month’s 155,954 was up 20 percent from April. Good news is where you find it.
Nonetheless, Ford is going ahead with its product plans, including controversial plug-in hybrids. I say they’re controversial because Toyota—which is launching a fleet of 500 of them—has lately been saying they don’t actually make a whole lot of sense for many buyers. If you need a refresher, these cars add a larger battery pack and plug-in capability to the familiar hybrid mix. One issue for Toyota is its launch of the 50-mpg 2010 Prius—it doesn’t want people to think that standard hybrids are obsolete (as San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom recently opined).
In an interview, Nancy Lee Gioia, Ford’s director of Sustainable Mobility Technologies and Hybrid Vehicle Programs, said Ford will have 21 plug-in hybrids in utility fleets by the end of the year, mostly in the U.S. but also in Canada. Hydro-Quebec is the latest partner in the three-year program, joining Detroit Edison, Con Edison, the New York Power Authority, Southern California Edison and others.
“One of the key things from our perspective with any vehicle that plugs in is to know what the value proposition is,” Gioia said. “With the utility program, we’re trying to create a learning environment so we can carry plug-in hybrids forward.”
The utilities are testing “mules” based on the current Escape, using a 10-kilowatt-hour battery pack and offering about 30 miles of electric range. But Ford plans to bring a plug-in hybrid to market in 2012 as part of a electrification strategy that also includes a battery-powered Transit Connect van next year (based on a conventional Euro-sourced van Ford will start selling later this year) and a battery car based on the next generation of the Focus in 2011. “We want to see valid customer need for all three of these technologies,” Gioia said.
Ford is bullish on its “blended” plug-in hybrids, which act like battery cars until the 30 miles of electric range is exhausted, then regular hybrids afterwards. “Our initial tests showed they could achieve up to 120 mpg, and now we’re seeing data well in excess of that,” Gioia said. “We’re very excited about these results meeting the needs of the 60 percent of our customers who drive less than 30 miles a day.”
Gioia called 30 miles of electric range “a good, sweet spot. We’re always trying to keep the battery system as small as possible, and with that range we can achieve that goal. The car has to be fun to drive, versatile, and do all the things that make a good car a good car.”
Ford will build 5,000 of its plug-in hybrids in 2012 and then, as Gioia puts it, “grow the market.” After the early adopters buy it, there has to be appeal to consumers “who understand how it fits into their usage.” Ford is prepared to scale up production, but “affordability is the key.” She’s right about that. As companies prepare to launch $30,000 to $40,000 limited-range battery electric cars, it’s unclear how consumers will respond—even with $7,500 federal tax credits."

US Dollar Collapse and Inflation: China's lower holding of U.S. Treasury bonds "response to weaker dollar" RMK.v, TNR.v, GBN.v, CGH.to, SNU.v, AMM.to

Recent Dollar small hesitation on the way down could be over very soon. If the health of "reserve currency of choice" US Dollar depends on what Russian finance minister thinks - then it is finished even sooner then we thought.
Who needs enemies if you have such friends? Should US Corp. send Mr Secretary to Brazil and Russia as well after China or Green Fellow will jump out of the window after it? Gold and Silver are in Tree Shaking mode and weakest will be gone at exactly the wrong moment. Cup and Handle on Gold is still in place.




China's lower holding of U.S. Treasury bonds "response to weaker dollar"




www.chinaview.cn 2009-06-16 22:39:55

BEIJING, June 16 (Xinhua) -- For the first time in more than one year, China reduced its holding of U.S. Treasury bonds, and experts told Xinhua Tuesday that move reflected concern over the safety of U.S.-dollar-linked assets.
Data from the U.S. Treasury showed China pared its stake in Treasury bonds by 4.4 billion U.S. dollars, to 763.5 billion U.S. dollars, as of the end of April compared with March.
Tan Yaling, an expert at the China Institute for Financial Derivatives at Peking University, told Xinhua that the move might reflect activity by China's institutional investors. "It was a rather small amount compared with the holdings of more than 700 billion U.S. dollars."
"It is unclear whether the reduction will continue because the amount is so small. But the cut signals caution of governments or institutions toward U.S. Treasury bonds," Zhang Bin, researcher with the Institute of World Economics and Politics of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, a government think tank, told Xinhua.
He added that the weakening U.S. dollar posed a threat to the holdings of U.S. Treasury bonds.
The U.S. government began to increase currency supply through purchases of Treasury bonds and other bonds in March, which raised concern among investors about the creditworthiness of U.S. Treasury bonds. The move also dented investor confidence in the U.S. dollar and dollar-linked assets.
China, the biggest holder of U.S. Treasury bonds, is highly exposed. In March, Premier Wen Jiabao called on the United States "to guarantee the safety of China's assets."
China is not the only nation that trimmed holdings of U.S. Treasury bonds in April: Japan, Russian and Brazil did likewise, to reduce their reliance on the U.S. dollar.
However, Tan said that U.S. Treasury bonds were still a good investment choice.
Hu Xiaolian, head of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, said in March that U.S. Treasury bonds played a very important role in China's investment of its foreign exchange reserves. China would continue to buy the bonds while keeping an eye on fluctuations.
Zhang said it would take months to see if China would lower its stake. Even so, any reduction would not be large, or international financial markets would be shaken, he said.
Wang Yuanlong, researcher with the Bank of China, said the root of the problem was the years of trade surpluses, which created the huge amount of foreign exchange reserves in China. It left China's assets tethered to the U.S. dollar, he said.
He said making the Renminbi a global currency would cut China's demand for the U.S. dollar and reduce its proportion in the trade surplus."

Lithium and REE: Electric Cars Will Flourish In 2010 TNR.v, SQM, ROC, DAI, BYD, TTM, NSANY, TM, RIMM, AAPL, GOOG, HUI, XAU, CDNX, FXI, WLC.v, AVL.to,

Government push, electric cars economics and Energy security is a very powerful combinations. Once billions will flow into the sector technology will move forward fast. All major companies have announced Electric cars models: safety and utility will not be an issue. With mass production cost per unit of batteries will go down and our Bull market with non elastic pricing for Lithium and REE will flourish.: price of lithium is 3-5% of total battery cost now and can increase dramatically before affecting total unit cost.






Electric Cars are advancing very quickly in green technologies and fuel economy. There are new electric cars, which some remain as auto concepts, that will offer consumers more variety and options in 2010.
By: Andy Hodges
Published: Jun 17, 2009
Updated: Jun 17, 2009


New electric cars in 2010 will offer better fuel economy and green technologies.
The new electric cars coming to market are meeting new government standards for carbon emissions and fuel economy. Some of the new electric cars already offer up to 50 MPG, but that's nothing in comparison to what will happen in 2011. Automakers are making serious advancements under the hood that will make hybrid cars in 2010 appear too conventional.
For example, the Toyota Prius can offer consumers a 50 MPG rating in combined fuel economy. The automobile offers better mileage with enhanced performance in comparison to current hybrids. The vehicle outputs ultra-low emissions and the ride is very comforting.
The electric motor is called a permanent magnet synchronous motor which can out put 80 horsepower with a 153 lb-ft torque. The Hybrid system net outputs 134 horsepower. The hybrid battery pack is nickel-metal hydride.
The vehicle also requires no belts under the hood for better fuel economy and less potential maintenance. This is one of the reasons why this is an eco-friendly car. The driver can also receive feedback, from the multi-information display panel, which can provide help to acquire economical driving habits.
New cars that run electric can save money and on future maintenance and repairs.
Electric cars can also money on potential maintenance costs involved with belt replacements. Most automobiles seem to offer 3 tiers of savings. First, you save money on gas, then you save money on future maintenance costs and repairs, and you get a tax credit for purchasing a new electric automobile.
The more you look into the electric battery alternative fuel solution, the more the savings keep adding up. Why buy a traditional gas guzzling vehicle when gas prices are rising again?
During the past 12 months or so, it seemed unlikely that an automaker could provide a 50 MPG rating on any automobile. It suddenly happened, and then we witnessed the 2010 Ford Fusion Hybrid achieve more than 1,400 miles of travel on a single tank. This marks the equivalent of 80 miles per gallon.
Electric cars are built using green technology and other breakthroughs for better fuel economy.
The automakers truly deserve credit for their breakthroughs in green technology and better fuel economy. While Chevrolet is betting everything on its Chevy Volt, other car manufacturers appear to be a step ahead. Toyota, Honda, Nissan, and Ford are delivering what consumers what today, but it seems like General Motors Corp is in a do-or-die situation.
GM claims that the Chevrolet Volt can drive up to 100 MPG on a single tank of gas. It's not known what percentage of that is electric power, or the size of the tank. Even so, using fuel to power vehicles will be something of the past as the hybrid market matures."



Lithium and batteries: Bull is charging on. TNR.v, SQM, ROC, GOOG, AAPL, RIMM, CDNX, FXI, F, DAI, NSANY, BYD, TTM, HUI, XAU, AVL.to, WLC.v, RM.v,

Can US Corp. allow to miss out on our Next Big Thing? Will it change its oil dependency to batteries and Lithium dependency? We position our investments for the Bull run to insure supply.


Money is coming into the sector. Investors are constantly searching for the new Bull. First they will go into battery makers and then into Lithium production itself. Our Juniors represent the most risky and leveraged plays in this Bull, but according to Junior Mining Economics they will be the source of new resources and preys in M&A games when serious money will be buying them to buy time rushing into the Next Big Thing.








"Sanyo's shares jumped 14.3 percent to 279 yen, outpacing a 1.7 percent gain in the electrical machinery subindex .IELEC.T. Sanyo was the second-most active share by volume on the Tokyo exchange's first section .AV.T.
Sanyo said on Tuesday that car makers in the United States, Japan and Europe have agreed to buy its auto-use lithium-ion batteries, as it looks to take advantage of growing demand for hybrid cars.
"I cannot name names, but we are working with multiple companies that represent big enough demand to fill the production lines at the new plants," Sanyo Executive Vice President Mitsuru Homma told Reuters in an interview on Tuesday. [ID:nT56632]
Car battery maker GS Yuasa Corp (6674.T), a rival of Sanyo's in auto-use rechargeable batteries, jumped 12.5 percent to 1,180 yen, and was the third-most active issue by volume after Sanyo.
Yamashita at Shinkin Asset Management said the jump in shares of Sanyo and GS Yuasa may be a sign that investors are flocking to individual brands that have specific themes amid uncertainty about the economic outlook.
During the global slump in demand for cars, fuel-sipping hybrid cars have become a bright spot for the industry, with Honda Motor Co Ltd (7267.T) and Toyota Motor Corp (7203.T) seeing robust demand for their latest models.
Demand for eco-friendly cars has also been supported by new Japanese government tax incentives for low-emission cars that were introduced in April.
Trade was active, with 2.5 billion shares changing hands on the Tokyo exchange's first section, equal with last week's daily average.
Advancers outpaced decliners by more than 3 to 1. (Additional reporting by Elaine Lies; Editing by Hugh Lawson)"

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Lithium and REE: Canada post can deliver an Electric Car mass market. TNR.v, SQM, ROC, TTM, BYD, DAI, F, NSANY, HUI, XAU, AVL.to, RM.v, CLQ.v, FXI,

This is the way to go to spread our Green Mobility fast. Commercial fleets will bring volume and reduce prices of the most costly component - lithium batteries. Solutions are ready and supermarkets chains like Tesco are putting electric vans on the roads already. Should we adjust Lithium Demand projections already?






Return to sender: 59,000 tons of carbon per year.
Switching the massive mail fleet to e-vehicles could make green cars cheaper for everyone.
By Irwin LoyPublished: June 15, 2009
TheTyee.ca
In a climate of surging fuel prices and environmental concern, it's cost, more than technology, which still presents a major barrier to the adoption of electric cars.
But the mailman could play a role delivering a battery-powered, zero emission future on the roads.
Canada Post represents one of the largest transportation fleets in the country.
Its armada of 7,000 mostly gas guzzlers traveled than 76 million kilometers of roadway last year, burning up 24 million litres of fuel and pumping out 59,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide in the process. Those figures are separate from the 45,000 tonnes of CO2 that Canada Post's rural and suburban carriers emitted as part of their work.
Canada Post's Green Targets 'Postponed'
In 2007, Canada Post projected it would cut greenhouse gas emissions by 14 per cent by 2012. But already, the Crown corp. admits its financial situation, caused by"“the current global economic downturn," will seriously affect its green targets.
"Our low level of profitability has limited the funds available... forcing us to postpone energy-efficiency initiatives that could have reduced emissions from our buildings," Canada Post's social responsibility report states.
And a "new delivery model" could even see many letter carriers who now deliver on foot be plopped into vehicles.
"The new model... will contribute to a significant increase in the size of our fleet," the report states.
Present sources of Canada Post's GHG emissions, and their percentages of the whole, are: Buildings: 43 per cent; Fleet: 28 per cent; Rural/suburban fleet: 21 per cent; Planes: 8 per cent.
As part of the flagship fleet of a federal government that's looking to encourage fuel-efficient vehicles in the consumer market, the typical Canada Post delivery truck isn't exactly a beacon of progress in the public sector.
But with clearly defined, relatively short delivery routes in urban centres, today's already available electric engine technology could be well suited to Canada Post’s needs.
The idea isn't merely symbolic.
A move to electrify the fleet could provide a crucial spark needed to ignite a homegrown electric truck industry and boost development in the consumer market.
A market 'ready to explode'
"The electric vehicle market is ready to explode," says Mike Elwood, chair of the Canadian Electric Vehicle Technology Roadmap, the federal working group examining how to advance EVs in Canada.
"But it's not up to capacity. All the pieces of the puzzle exist, but there's just no scale right now," says Elwood, also vice-president of marketing at Azure Dynamics, which sells hybrid electric trucks.
If a major player like Canada Post were to move to electrify its fleet, it could kick-start the industry.
"It would be amazing," Elwood said. "You'd start to see capacity increase, you'd see costs coming down. You'd see lots of things happening, all on the positive side of the ledger."
But despite a long interest in going electric, Canada Post has taken only a few cautious steps to transform its fleet towards alternative fuel technology.
US report green lights electric mail vehicles
The wheels are already in motion elsewhere. France's postal service, La Poste, is testing electric delivery vehicles, with the aim of integrating 500 into its fleet immediately after a successful test, the first batch from a target of 10,000 within five years.
And south of the border, the U.S. Postal Service has been studying the idea closely. A recent draft study and slide presentation prepared by staff for one of the independent members of the U.S. Postal Commission, a body that has regulatory oversight over the Postal Service, recommended fleet electrification as "an integral part of [U.S.] energy goals."
"Electrification of the Postal Service delivery vehicle fleet is practical, achievable and desirable, and should be initiated now," the report concluded.
"Car manufacturers today are applying substantial resources to developing electric drive vehicles, a task made difficult because of the driving distance range they believe consumers require and want. This particular difficulty does not apply to postal delivery."
The idea of going electric is hardly revolutionary. As reported in a previous story, industry and government are already assuming the electric car will be viable and in wide use within the next decade or, at most, two.
A century ago, in a time when 38 per cent of U.S. vehicles were battery-powered, that country's Postal Service used electric trucks to deliver mail, the report notes.
But gas powered vehicles eventually took over, spurred on by numerous factors, including the wide availability of the fuel, the relative costliness of electricity at the time and, not the least significant, the introduction of Ford's Model T and its mass production capabilities.
Still, the now-defunct American Railway Express operated a fleet of electric delivery trucks into well into the 1950s and 1960s, according to the commission report.
Electric trucks far more efficient: federal study
Canada Post has already studied the issue and concluded going electric was viable -- ten years ago.
A 1999 study by Environment Canada, Transport Canada and Canada Post pitted a traditional postal delivery truck against one that was converted to electric propulsion. On a simulated 30-km cycle that factored in the inclement weather conditions the average truck might face in Canada, the study found the electric vehicle to be at least three times more energy efficient than the gas powered truck.
It found the electric truck emitted four times less carbon dioxide than the regular truck. And it concluded the electric truck released 99 per cent less pollutants than the traditional gas engine.
The report, however, raised concerns over what it saw as the electric truck's "marginally acceptable" road performance at the time -- an 80 km/h top speed and a 0 to 80 km/h acceleration time of 55 seconds. Still, it reasoned that those problems could be overcome.
"The electric truck is a viable and more environmentally sustainable mail delivery vehicle for Canada Post," the study concluded.
Up against freezing cold, long routes
But ten years later, despite having added 1,000 new vehicles to the fleet, alternative technology makes up only 0.24 per cent of its vehicles, according to Canada Post stats. That includes two fuel-efficient light vehicles and some 30 hybrid cars or SUVs.
It's a drop in the bucket compared to the fleet's 1,720 light vans, 2,170 right-hand drive vans and 2,680 step vans, which, with an average fuel consumption rate last year of 33 litres for every 100 km, pegs it a few notches below a Hummer on a list of fuel friendliness.
Canada Post's national fleet manager, Ron Thibert, says its initial electric vehicle trials were promising, but not enough to adopt the technology.
"What that particular project enlightened us on was the immaturity of the batteries and the control components at the time," Thibert says.
While EVs may be suited to the typical 30-km circuit, Thibert says testing found the electric trucks struggled with routes that, for example, could start with an initial 8-km highway leg.
"It demands a lot of energy out of that battery pack," he says. "It just left us hanging at the end of the route. Now put that in context with a winter day at -25C. That challenge gets really difficult."
But, as Thibert acknowledges, the initial trial was a decade ago.
"There's a lot of promise right now. With the [automobile] marketplace in the turmoil that it's in, it has generated a lot of interest," he says.
'Pivotal' next years
For now, Canada Post's public plans for greening its fleet are general.
The Crown corporation plans to move towards vehicles with smaller engines to replace its larger step vans. It sets a timeline of 2010 to 2015 to accomplish its goal, but there's no set target.
"You're probably going to see a step-stone approach," Thibert says. "In the very near term, the vehicles are going to be much smaller, much more fuel efficient that way."
The adoption of alternative technology like EVs will depend on what the market produces.
"The next two years are going to be very pivotal," he says.
Others are moving faster.
In 2003, Canada Post's subsidiary, Purolator, signed an agreement with Azure Dynamics to potentially order up to 2,000 made-in-Canada hybrid electric vehicles, a figure that accounted for more than half the courier's urban fleet at the time. So far, Purolator has bought about 150 of the vehicles and put them to work doing curbside delivery (Thibert says the Purolator vehicles are heavier than what Canada Post needs).
No doubt, one key difference may be Purolator's comparatively rosy financial situation. "The post office is in a financially precarious position," according to the strategic review of the Crown corp. released earlier this year. "Canada Post Corporation's existing level of profits is derived primarily from its Purolator subsidiary. The Canada Post segment itself is barely breaking even."
'Government has to lead the way': Elwood
Cost, too, is an obvious barrier within the private sector.
Water delivery company Canadian Springs recently bought the first hybrid electric in its delivery fleet of 275 nationwide, at a $50,000 premium over a traditional Class 7 beverage body truck.
"They're very expensive," says Mengo McCall, Canadian Springs's director of business development. Some of the funds to buy the truck came from the province's Green Fleets B.C. program.
But McCall is waiting for the market to produce equivalent plug-in battery trucks in the right size.
"As soon as the electric trucks are available for our type of business, we would gladly get them," he said. "I see the next step as plug-in hybrids and after that, all-electric trucks. We're waiting for the technology to come around."
For evTRM chair Mike Elwood, the future of electric vehicles in Canadian fleets comes full circle to the government.
Whether it's subsidizing private companies like Canadian Springs through one-off grants, or laying down the cash to roll out green public sector fleets, the initial spark has to come from somewhere.
"Government has to lead the way here," Elwood says. "One way or the other, they're going to have to do it. It's either they're going to have to put our large subsidies to the general public for private companies to acquire these vehicles, or they become purchasers and buy volume. But by going in that direction, they send out a loud message."

Monday, June 15, 2009

Lithium and REE: Silicon Valley and Green mobility - Recharging the future Bull. TNR.v, TTM, SQM, ROC, DAI, NSANY, F, BYD, GOOG, RIMM, AAPL, HUI, XAU,

Our Next Big Thing is following previous technological boom: World Wide Web - Internet, standardisation will bring an explosive growth, inter connectivity and wide acceptance in the market place. Some Juniors are trying to join the hey days of start ups and innovations as well: talking about incubators and project generation models - minimising dilution and allowing fast strategic deals for project developments.






Some players in the market envision a Java-like platform to accelerate deployment and foster innovation
By Josie Garthwaite
Technology

A growing number of political leaders—from mayors on up to presidents and prime ministers —are taking up the electric vehicle (EV) torch, working on policies and incentives to spur widespread adoption of plug-in cars. In parts of the U.S., U.K., Japan, and elsewhere, initiatives to quickly develop networks of charging stations for the plug-in vehicles slated to roll out in 2011 and beyond are taking form—and running up against a key question on the road to a competitive green car marketplace: How do you accelerate deployment of today's technology while remaining open to future innovations?
On some level, this question is about the familiar issue of how (and how much) government should play a role in free markets. But it's also another example of how lessons from the history of computing can apply to cleantech innovations. According to the finance chief for London's climate change program, Padmesh Shukla, Sun Microsystems' Java platform—an ubiquitous system for software development for mobile devices, enterprise servers, and the Web—offers a model governments can use to craft guidelines for companies bidding on government-backed EV infrastructure projects.
Bottom line, Shukla said at a recent panel hosted by Think London, which works to attract direct investment in the city and help foreign companies set up business there, London wants to have EV infrastructure that looks more like Java, which software developers can use for free, than Microsoft's proprietary technology. "It has to be an open platform," Shukla said.
In software, open platforms allow third parties to add functionality to a basic framework—providing, as O'Reilly Radar explained back in 2007, tools and services that the platform provider has not gotten around to yet or has not done well. For electric vehicle infrastructure, Shukla explained that the London government, working in conjunction with larger U.K. initiatives, does not want to pick one technology or company to have a monopoly on charging infrastructure. Using the open platform model, the idea is to help foster development of common standards, tools, and practices for charge point developers, ensuring that all charging stations can operate with all electric models and generally create an environment in which electric car companies can prosper.
"It's a chicken-and-egg problem," Shukla said. Limited access to charge points drags down demand for electric cars, and a limited number of electric cars on the road drags down business for charge point developers. So London is trying to foster an EV-friendly environment with policies such as a mandate for all new residential developments above a certain density to have charge points in their parking lots. The city has also committed to investing in a public charge-point network with funds that it expects to be matched by the national government and again by private investors.
California utility San Diego Gas & Electric also envisions an open model. SDG&E Clean Transportation Manager Bill Zobel—who is working (among other things) on the utility's partnership with the Renault-Nissan Alliance to prepare its system for new demand from the automakers' plug-in vehicles—told us earlier this year that the utility is talking with several charging companies about how to integrate their hardware with the grid. But Zobel told us SDG&E plans to leave the selection of different charging hardware and services to its customers—whether public agencies, property owners, or businesses.
Through its talks with charge point developers, SDG&E is helping to set up an informal framework. On the other hand, Shukla's team in London, by establishing the guidelines for what technologies will qualify for government funds for the planned citywide charging network, is creating a more formal one. In both cases, we're in early days. SDG&E is months away from getting its first test fleet on the road, and London remains up to a year away from "fully baking" the details on how to bid for the charge point network buildout. But setting out with an open platform is a good way to start. Shukla said at the Think London panel that the idea is to "start building templates for the market to see that these things can be done," and then let it take over from there."

Lithium and REE: Race is on - Snatching the car battery biz from Asia. TNR.v, SQM, ROC, DAI, TTM, NSANY, BYD, GOOG, AAPL, RIMM, HUI, XAU, WLC.v, CLQ.v

Lithium batteries race is on and we are working with our juniors on Lithium and REE supply. Next industrial revolution not only means to address the US baby boomers demographic bust: mass exodus from working force and change of their investment and living criteria, but also geopolitical strength of ailing US Corp. Real race is between new rising power of China spiced by BRICS and US Empire - who will be able to get out of the Oil needle first and improve (China) or sustain (US Corp.) life style of its subjects? There are estimations that at oil price close to 70-80 USD/barrel around 1 Trillion dollars was paid annually for oil Import. US Corp can not afford it at prices above 100USD/barrel any more. For over the half of the century control over Oil meant control over economic development: how much China would pay for an effort to make all latest "liberation operations" by US Corp Null and Void just moving up the technological chain into Electric mobility space? We have mentioned time over time that decoupling is here already with China at Two Trillion reserve and US Corp. at Two Trillion deficit. Electric cars were killed a few times before, but this time everything is different: it is a matter of survival for USA and it is not at the mercy of its Masters an y more - China is dictating the shift and US is catching on - at the heart of the battle are macro and micro economics: employment, new manufacturing base, high tech utilisation and its military applications and 5 cents per mile against 15 cents in best case with convectional engine. We hope for the sake of "democracy survival" that this time is too much at stake to kill the idea in the "Free world" and all recent news are supporting this notion. Who will win technological race? We do not know and investing in commodities for the future and building our presence in this Bull market, where winners will the our buyers.







Ener1 aims to fuel the car of the future and bring jobs to the Midwest. But the jury is still out on whether or not it can compete against its larger, more established rivals.

By Steve Hargreaves, CNNMoney.com staff writer
Last Updated: June 15, 2009: 9:19 AM ET
INDIANAPOLIS (CNNMoney.com) -- Thousands of jobs are riding on Ener1's efforts to build the best car battery in the world.
The start-up firm is the only U.S. company able to mass produce batteries on American soil for an automobile industry poised to make a monumental shift from gasoline to electric power.
Many say whoever controls the battery industry will control the auto industry and the thousands of jobs that go with it.
Ener1's newly opened production facility near Indianapolis could employ 3,000 workers. Like other renewable energy companies popping up in the Midwest, people are hoping Ener1 can replace some of the fast-disappearing auto and other manufacturing jobs.
Its lithium-ion battery technology is praised for being one of the best available. But Ener1 must compete for big contracts against larger, mostly Asian firms with much more experience in this field.
"Things will be difficult," said Brian Sponheimer, an analyst at Gabelli & Co., the research arm of GAMCO Investors. "There's a lot of optimism about their chemistry, but they haven't been tapped for a major program yet."
The race to develop a suitable electric car battery is exciting and Ener1 is certainly fighting hard to win.
Its employees have a desire to usher in a game-changing technology for not only the auto industry but the entire energy sector.
"This should be the dream of all battery engineers, to replace oil," said Naoki Ota, the firm's chief science officer.
The company's spotless Indianapolis production facility is buzzing with activity. Workers in white suits scurry about, trying to hide proprietary technology from our camera.
The company has applied for a $480 million government loan to expand its facility and hopefully allow it to land a big contract. If that happens, Ener1 says it will go on a hiring spree.
"We're talking about a serious growth in people," Ulrik Grape, head of the company's car battery division.
The company could then start making batteries on a large scale. Still, its lack of experience in manufacturing remains a problem.
Many of its competitors, including Japan's Panasonic and NEC, South Korea's LG, and a joint venture between U.S.-based Johnson Controls (JCI, Fortune 500) and the French company Saft, have been making batteries in high volumes for decades.
If Ford or General Motors are going to buy batteries for an electric car, they need confidence the company they're buying from can deliver.
"They need to illustrate their competitiveness," said Sponheimer. "They need to find someone that trusts them."
The company is working on it. They've been supplying the Norwegian firm Think Automotive with batteries for over a year, and recently announced a preliminary deal with upmarket California carmaker Fisker.
These are good starts, analysts say, but the company still needs to prove itself on a larger scale. The lack of experience may be one reason why GM decided to go with LG when choosing a battery supplier for its much-hyped Volt.
Manufacturing know-how aside, analysts are generally upbeat on the firm.
That Ener1 actually has a production facility in the United States gives it an immediate advantage, said Michael Lew, an analyst with Think Equity. Car batteries are heavy and expensive to ship, and it can take up to two years to build a new facility in the United States.
Lewis also noted that while Ener1 competitors may have experience making other types of batteries, the lithium ion field for cars is still a new game for everyone.
"They have as good a chance as anyone else," said Lew, but he also noted the company's ability to perfect large-scale manufacturing as its major challenge.
On the technology side, Ener1 is thought to have some of the best ideas going.
The chemicals it uses in coating the lithium strips that make up the battery are said to be top-notch. Unlike some of its competitors, the chemicals allow the company to produce different types of batteries for different types of vehicles. That's a competitive advantage, said Banc of America Securities-Merrill Lynch alternative energy analyst Steven Milunovich, who has a buy rating on the stock.
And the design of the battery itself, which allows several cells to be stacked on one another reducing the chance it will catch on fire, is also praised.
The company's technical prowess is how Charles Gassenheimer, the company's chief executive, responds to questions about whether it can compete in this global battery race.
"We are the first people to provide this breakthrough in terms of the flat, stacked design and work with revolutionary new chemistries," Gassenheimer recently told Fortune, CNNMoney's sister publication. "We may have as much as a two year advantage over our competition."
Another good sign for the firm: After doing much research into the company's business plan, the government is still considering giving it the $480 million loan.
"If they get the money, the government thinks it has a fighting chance," said Milunovich.
Ener1 may be the only U.S. company making batteries in America now, but they probably won't be for long. The privately held A123 Systems, which already makes batteries in Asia, may have a plant stateside in the next few years.
And smaller firms like Maxwell (MXWL), Valence (VLNC) or the scores of other entrepreneurs aspiring to make a cheap, light, fast-charging, long-lasting car batteries will likely enter the fray with Ener1.
It remains to be seen though, if any of them can stand up to the competition from Asian giants.
First Published: June 15, 2009: 3:45 AM ET"

Saturday, June 13, 2009

Lithium and REE: Toyota to start plug-in hybrid leasing TNR.v, SQM, ROC, TTM, BYD, TM, NSANY, DAI, F, BYD, GOOG, AAPL, RIMM, AVL.to, RES.v, WLC.v,

Next Big Thing future depends on growth, we need to have fertile environment for its exponential growth, some news are pointing in that direction:
" TOYOTA CITY, Japan — Throughout Toyota’s global operations, managers are scrambling to cut costs in the wake of record losses.
Shizuo Kambayashi/Associated Press
Prius plants in Japan are humming 24 hours a day, which is reviving some Toyota suppliers.
But at Toyota’s Tsutsumi plant, managers have the opposite problem: meeting demand for the third generation of the Prius, which has become an instant hit in Japan and is rolling into American showrooms now.
The Prius plant has brought back overtime — a rarity these days, given Japan’s weak economy — and recruited workers from Toyota factories across the country..."
We have now an important move of Toyta to Lithium-ion batteries and push of its cars into the new markets. Toyta has the most advanced manufacturing facilities of Hybrids so far and their move into Plug-in space speaks volumes: nobody would like to lose this race in Next Big Thing.






By Yuri Kageyama
Posted: 06/12/2009 09:57:23 AM PDT

TOKYO Toyota said last week it will start leasing plug-in hybrid cars, that are even greener than its hit Prius, by the end of this year in the U.S., Japan and Europe.
Toyota Motor Corp., the world's top automaker, will start leasing 200 plug-ins in Japan, 150 in the U.S. and 150 in Europe, mostly for rental, such as through special government-backed programs.
Toyota will for the first time use lithium-ion batteries in the plug-ins. The batteries are already used in some cars but more common in laptops and other gadgets.
Toyota hybrids now use nickel-metal hydride batteries. Using a lithium-ion battery will produce more energy, allowing the car to run more as an electric vehicle, but there have been some technological hurdles.
A plug-in recharges from a regular household socket. When the battery runs low, it will start running as a regular hybrid so drivers don't have to worry about running out of juice on the road.
Automakers around the world are working on plug-in models. Recharging stations are expected to proliferate in the cities of the future, much like gasoline stands, for recharging.
The booming sales of the revamped Prius, which went on sale last month, have been a rare bright spot for Toyota.
Battered by the global slump and the strong yen, the maker of the Camry sedan and Lexus luxury models recorded its worst loss in its seven-decade history for the fiscal year ended March.
Toyota dealers have received 110,000 orders for the Prius in Japan. Toyota
acknowledged last week an order placed this month won't get delivered until November or later
.
Toyota leads the world in cumulative hybrid sales because of the popularity of the Prius, now in its third generation. The first-generation Prius went on sale in 1997.
Associated Press."

Friday, June 12, 2009

Lithium and REE: Now all Hydrogen investors are welcome to our Next Big Thing. TNR.v, SQM, ROC, ESLR, FCEL, BLDP, PLUG, TTM, F, DAI, NSANY, FXI

We have another very important foundation for our new Bull: plus to positive economics of Electric Cars we have a huge advantage of Energy Transformation cycle over Hydrogen technology, where billions was spend during the previous technological Bubble.


We know what we are talking about: we had a nice roller coaster ride in BLDP, FCEL and PLUG. After Nasdaq crash in 2000 Bull market hey days never come again. Now we have explanation why. Our Next Big Thing - Green Mobility Revolution based on Electric Cars has all economics in favor of Lithium batteries as an industry standard. Mass market will bring prices of electric cars down and they will become everyday reality very soon. Now we have to be ready for Lithium and REE supply to meet growing demand.





"Why Hydrogen Was Killed In Favor Of Electrics (TM, HMC, F)



"James AndersonJun. 9, 2009, 8:37 AM30
In a perfect world, all energy would come from electricity and hydrogen. Wind, solar, tidal, geothermal, and other renewable energy sources would provide enough electricity to power everything except air transportation. The “conventional” answer to transportation in the future was the hydrogen fuel cell. It doesn’t get any better than that. The fuel cell burns hydrogen and powers cars, trucks, and any other transportation vehicle. The hydrogen combines with oxygen to form water vapor. No other gases or pollutants are released. The hydrogen fuel cell is an efficient generator of electricity, but it has one major problem: It needs hydrogen. So where does it get it? Therein lies the hydrogen myth. On Earth, there's no hydrogen to mine. You have to make it, and that requires wasting energy. You could conceivably mine hydrogen from the sun or Jupiter, but even Al Gore would probably agree that that would be tough to accomplish. Last month, the Department of Energy (DOE) finally conceded that hydrogen won't be a part of the near-term solution to global warming, the peak oil crisis, or anything else you can think of. They're cutting back funding dramatically on hydrogen research. This is a triumph of physics over policy. In the long run, physics will always win, but we have way too many policy wonks in Washington without a clue about how the physical world works. Even if hydrogen could be produced cheaply, it has another problem that makes it impractical as a fuel for transportation. Even when highly compressed, the energy density per liter or gallon is very low compared to gasoline or diesel fuel. Think about the size of the fuel tanks on the trucks that deliver gasoline to a station compared to the size of the tank on the truck. The ratio is about 90 to 1. That’s an efficient delivery system. If a hydrogen delivery truck had to burn hydrogen, the size of the fuel tank for the engine would be about one-quarter of the size of the delivery tank! Energy density or transportation problems didn’t kill hydrogen. What killed it is the deliverable amount of energy to the wheels of a vehicle compared to a battery solution. This is why we won't be seeing hydrogen-powered cars from Toyota (TM), Honda (HMC), or Ford (F).The table below needs a little explanation. It starts with 100 kilowatts of electricity from renewable sources -- solar or wind for example. It then compares the steps required to get the electrical energy stored on a vehicle as either hydrogen or batteries. During each step, energy is lost -- generally as heat -- until electric power is driving the electric motors on a hydrogen fuel cell vehicle or a battery-powered vehicle. Each step shows the percentage efficiency and the remaining energy left after each step.This table used data from an article published by Ulf Bossel entitled, "Does a Hydrogen Economy Make Sense?" in Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 94, No. 10, October 2006. You can argue all you want about the exact percentages used in each step, but the result won't be much different. A battery-powered vehicle will be close to 3 times as efficient as a hydrogen- powered fuel cell vehicle. The DOE got it right. If the one word back in the 1967 movie The Graduate was “plastics," the word for the future will be “batteries,” with the possible addition of “ultracaps." I’ll discuss batteries and a potential “ultracap play” in a follow-up article.
This post originally appeared on Minyanville. "